229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.50%
Positive revenue growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
5.47%
Positive gross profit growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-4.00%
Negative EBIT growth while VUZI is at 11.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.00%
Negative operating income growth while VUZI is at 10.47%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
32.61%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.25%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
31.82%
EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
27.27%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
2.65%
Share count expansion well above VUZI's 0.33%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.80%
Diluted share count expanding well above VUZI's 0.33%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.90%
Positive OCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
565.38%
Positive FCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-40.62%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-0.69%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
26.98%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-5.81%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI stands at 60.75%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
84.20%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 51.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
694.63%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 12.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-71.98%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VUZI is at 33.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-76.92%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VUZI is 14.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-7.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VUZI is 36.24%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
35.86%
Positive growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
24.47%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
15.99%
Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.52%
Our AR growth while VUZI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
14.29%
We show growth while VUZI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
7.25%
Asset growth above 1.5x VUZI's 3.19%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.41%
BV/share growth above 1.5x VUZI's 2.76%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.63%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
2.61%
We expand SG&A while VUZI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
