229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.68%
Positive revenue growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
13.42%
Positive gross profit growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
77.78%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.13%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
77.78%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 10.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
73.77%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.25%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
68.97%
EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
67.86%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
2.27%
Share count expansion well above VUZI's 0.33%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.35%
Diluted share count expanding well above VUZI's 0.33%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
109.95%
Positive OCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
121.97%
Positive FCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-40.93%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
43.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
48.24%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
14.70%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VUZI's 60.75%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
66.28%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 51.30%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
47.35%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 12.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-42.06%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VUZI is at 33.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-21.86%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while VUZI is 14.04%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
46.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 36.24%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
33.49%
Positive growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
33.81%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
18.44%
Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
23.05%
Our AR growth while VUZI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
40.28%
We show growth while VUZI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
11.45%
Asset growth above 1.5x VUZI's 3.19%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
3.14%
1.25-1.5x VUZI's 2.76%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.40%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
7.06%
We expand SG&A while VUZI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
