229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
48.51%
Positive revenue growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
57.10%
Positive gross profit growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
214.84%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.13%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
214.84%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 10.47%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
178.30%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 11.25%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
173.47%
EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
168.09%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
2.86%
Share count expansion well above VUZI's 0.33%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
3.28%
Diluted share count expanding well above VUZI's 0.33%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
74.94%
Positive OCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
86.72%
Positive FCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-24.03%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
21.60%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
126.03%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
5.46%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VUZI's 60.75%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
69.62%
5Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 51.30%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capital spending or working-capital efficiencies explain the difference.
1543.25%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 12.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-3.27%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VUZI is at 33.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
31.60%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 14.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
591.34%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 36.24%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
39.32%
Positive growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
7.09%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
30.01%
Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.76%
Our AR growth while VUZI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
54.46%
We show growth while VUZI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
16.30%
Asset growth above 1.5x VUZI's 3.19%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
10.89%
BV/share growth above 1.5x VUZI's 2.76%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.82%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
24.01%
We expand SG&A while VUZI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
