229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-24.18%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-17.07%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-7.73%
Negative EBIT growth while VUZI is at 11.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-7.73%
Negative operating income growth while VUZI is at 10.47%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-27.43%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 11.25%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-28.40%
Negative EPS growth while VUZI is at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-27.71%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VUZI is at 9.09%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.22%
Share count expansion well above VUZI's 0.33%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.50%
Diluted share count expanding well above VUZI's 0.33%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-144.17%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-258.21%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
17.35%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
150.73%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
153.38%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
79.69%
10Y OCF/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 60.75%. Bruce Berkowitz would confirm if the firm's long-term capital allocation yields better cash returns.
-133.84%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI is at 51.30%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-209.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI stands at 12.89%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
132.59%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 33.50% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
684.82%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 14.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
2410.90%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 36.24%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
148.39%
Positive growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
91.18%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
79.84%
Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-100.00%
Cut dividends over 10 years while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
49.06%
Our AR growth while VUZI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-16.39%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-1.90%
Negative asset growth while VUZI invests at 3.19%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.36%
75-90% of VUZI's 2.76%. Bill Ackman advocates improvements in profitability or buybacks to keep pace in net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.30%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-6.33%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
