229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
10.69%
Positive revenue growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
6.57%
Positive gross profit growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-15.90%
Negative EBIT growth while VUZI is at 11.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-15.90%
Negative operating income growth while VUZI is at 10.47%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
14.83%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 11.25%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
14.65%
EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
14.58%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.30%
Share count expansion well above VUZI's 0.33%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.32%
Diluted share count expanding well above VUZI's 0.33%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.77%
Positive OCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
18.18%
Positive FCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
21.58%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
174.09%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
139.24%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
51.22%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of VUZI's 60.75%. Bill Ackman would demand strategic changes to close the gap in long-term cash generation.
215.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 51.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1125.90%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 12.89%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
1164.79%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 33.50% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
574.74%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 14.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
944.89%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 36.24%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
183.02%
Positive growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
109.27%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
100.54%
Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
35.86%
Our AR growth while VUZI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
26.76%
We show growth while VUZI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
13.83%
Asset growth above 1.5x VUZI's 3.19%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
6.69%
BV/share growth above 1.5x VUZI's 2.76%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.29%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
7.02%
We expand SG&A while VUZI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
