229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.39%
Revenue growth under 50% of VUZI's 39.71%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
19.55%
Gross profit growth under 50% of VUZI's 43.67%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
31.16%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VUZI's 2.97%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
31.16%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 2.97%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
35.48%
Positive net income growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
34.83%
EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 10.34%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
34.58%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 10.34%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.48%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VUZI's 19.67%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.57%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x VUZI's 19.67%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
37.00%
Positive OCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
32.03%
Positive FCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
416.35%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
258.76%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
94.04%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
897.10%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
499.66%
Positive OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
180.32%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
948.40%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1241.71%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
192.12%
Positive short-term CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
612.45%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 87.05%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
432.43%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 87.05%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
201.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 87.05%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.98%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. VUZI's 76.43%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
19.74%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 38.30%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
-1.33%
Negative asset growth while VUZI invests at 84.81%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
21.63%
Under 50% of VUZI's 93.30%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.99%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
5.25%
SG&A declining or stable vs. VUZI's 39.10%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
