229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-13.93%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-12.26%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-15.79%
Negative EBIT growth while VUZI is at 8.91%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-15.79%
Negative operating income growth while VUZI is at 8.91%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-9.00%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 8.11%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-7.69%
Negative EPS growth while VUZI is at 9.30%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-7.69%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VUZI is at 9.30%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.44%
Share change of 0.44% while VUZI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.34%
Diluted share change of 0.34% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-59.70%
Negative OCF growth while VUZI is at 95.87%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-62.43%
Negative FCF growth while VUZI is at 91.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
396.07%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
270.67%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
143.85%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
2630.18%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
287.10%
Positive OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
201.86%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
843.00%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
843.93%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
279.63%
Positive short-term CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
567.25%
Equity/share CAGR of 567.25% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
448.69%
Equity/share CAGR of 448.69% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
205.17%
Equity/share CAGR of 205.17% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.87%
Firm’s AR is declining while VUZI shows 37.81%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
10.76%
We show growth while VUZI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
5.81%
Asset growth above 1.5x VUZI's 1.71%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
9.52%
Positive BV/share change while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.04%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-5.28%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
