229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
29.57%
Revenue growth under 50% of VUZI's 103.70%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
22.43%
Gross profit growth under 50% of VUZI's 165.07%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
28.65%
EBIT growth below 50% of VUZI's 88.90%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
28.65%
Operating income growth under 50% of VUZI's 88.90%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
32.43%
Net income growth at 50-75% of VUZI's 59.89%. Martin Whitman would question fundamental disadvantages in expenses or demand.
30.77%
EPS growth at 50-75% of VUZI's 58.82%. Martin Whitman would suspect a lag in operational efficiency or a higher share count.
30.77%
Diluted EPS growth at 50-75% of VUZI's 58.82%. Martin Whitman would question if share issuance or modest net income gains hamper progress.
0.26%
Share change of 0.26% while VUZI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.16%
Diluted share change of 0.16% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.37%
Positive OCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
16.65%
Positive FCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
677.84%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
396.80%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
211.59%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
2471.80%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
578.79%
Positive OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
219.08%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1711.94%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 41.77% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
799.88%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 41.77%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
353.79%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 41.77%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
732.03%
Positive growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
477.90%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
213.16%
Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.89%
Firm’s AR is declining while VUZI shows 111.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
11.57%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. VUZI's 25.47%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
16.16%
Asset growth well under 50% of VUZI's 70.39%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
10.57%
50-75% of VUZI's 19.15%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.47%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. VUZI's 6.39%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
9.25%
SG&A declining or stable vs. VUZI's 23.36%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
