229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.76%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-0.78%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
0.60%
Positive EBIT growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
0.60%
Positive operating income growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-0.28%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.42%
Share change of 0.42% while VUZI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.30%
Diluted share change of 0.30% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-36.37%
Negative OCF growth while VUZI is at 119.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-34.63%
Negative FCF growth while VUZI is at 115.16%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1192.38%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
415.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
212.84%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
10696.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 27.17%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
4631.75%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 27.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
396.64%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 27.17%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
10338.87%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 25.40% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1230.09%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 25.40%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
445.83%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 25.40%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1133.06%
Equity/share CAGR of 1133.06% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
544.98%
Equity/share CAGR of 544.98% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
224.44%
Equity/share CAGR of 224.44% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.03%
Our AR growth while VUZI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
5.08%
We show growth while VUZI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
9.41%
Positive asset growth while VUZI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
11.98%
Positive BV/share change while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.04%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. VUZI's 1.71%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-7.01%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
