229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.83%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of VUZI's 22.10%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
16.68%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VUZI's 0.59%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
19.11%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VUZI's 0.91%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
19.11%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 0.91%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
22.06%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 0.75%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
21.74%
EPS growth of 21.74% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
21.74%
Diluted EPS growth of 21.74% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
0.32%
Share count expansion well above VUZI's 0.01%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.20%
Diluted share count expanding well above VUZI's 0.01%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.61%
Positive OCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
82.38%
Positive FCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
1358.93%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
501.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
265.27%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
25452.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 110.16%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
914.06%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 110.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
702.41%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 110.16%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
8923.39%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 42.05% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1323.36%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 42.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
550.53%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 42.05%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1253.76%
Positive growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
583.25%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
237.23%
Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.39%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. VUZI's 15.82%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-4.41%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
12.49%
Positive asset growth while VUZI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
12.44%
Positive BV/share change while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.09%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
8.62%
SG&A growth well above VUZI's 2.29%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
