229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
63.89%
Positive revenue growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
81.92%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VUZI's 26.13%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
99.08%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VUZI's 61.82%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
99.08%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 61.82%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
97.25%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 47.59%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
100.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 47.83%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
100.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 47.83%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.30%
Share count expansion well above VUZI's 0.22%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.22%
Diluted share count expanding well above VUZI's 0.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.32%
OCF growth under 50% of VUZI's 515.92%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
175.26%
FCF growth similar to VUZI's 176.87%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to parallel capital spending and operational models.
2443.10%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
499.90%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
335.21%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
31443.02%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 131.85%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
791.95%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 131.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
325.70%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 131.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
25845.92%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1098.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
677.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1613.67%
Equity/share CAGR of 1613.67% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
638.86%
Equity/share CAGR of 638.86% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
275.40%
Equity/share CAGR of 275.40% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
207.02%
Our AR growth while VUZI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
59.28%
We show growth while VUZI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
19.17%
Positive asset growth while VUZI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
17.19%
Positive BV/share change while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.52%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
28.64%
We expand SG&A while VUZI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
