229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.43%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-10.33%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-11.28%
Negative EBIT growth while VUZI is at 1139.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-11.28%
Negative operating income growth while VUZI is at 1139.38%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-11.04%
Negative net income growth while VUZI stands at 545.79%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-12.00%
Negative EPS growth while VUZI is at 541.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-12.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VUZI is at 525.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.27%
Slight or no buybacks while VUZI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.35%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x VUZI's 3.96%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.38%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-22.68%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1884.87%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
588.14%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
358.24%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
529107.93%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1660.26%
Positive OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1486.47%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
21902.06%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 400.87% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1295.24%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 400.87%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
820.68%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 400.87%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
1833.66%
Equity/share CAGR of 1833.66% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
672.77%
Equity/share CAGR of 672.77% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
302.46%
Equity/share CAGR of 302.46% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor gains can snowball into a bigger lead soon.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.28%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-10.84%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
8.84%
Positive asset growth while VUZI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
13.51%
Under 50% of VUZI's 51.08%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.95%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-10.21%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
