229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
51.57%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VUZI's 3.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
46.24%
Gross profit growth under 50% of VUZI's 167.38%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
57.26%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 44.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
57.26%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 44.27%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
59.04%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 33.88%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
61.29%
EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 35.00%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
58.06%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 35.00%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.06%
Share change of 0.06% while VUZI is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
-0.10%
Reduced diluted shares while VUZI is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
156.41%
OCF growth above 1.5x VUZI's 18.47%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
272.16%
FCF growth above 1.5x VUZI's 19.44%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
2732.38%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
429.26%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
234.49%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
16188.16%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 71.96%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
684.10%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 71.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
289.96%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 82.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
166808.11%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
671.64%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
272.57%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 38.31%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
2266.34%
Equity/share CAGR of 2266.34% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
606.94%
Equity/share CAGR of 606.94% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
242.62%
Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.11%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. VUZI's 31.37%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
83.94%
We show growth while VUZI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
11.37%
Asset growth well under 50% of VUZI's 27.13%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
7.66%
Positive BV/share change while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.48%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
11.33%
We expand SG&A while VUZI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
