Apple Inc. (AAPL)

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Slight or no buybacks while VUZI is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

Equity/share CAGR of 2411.76% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.

Equity/share CAGR of 602.52% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.

Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Firm’s AR is declining while VUZI shows 0.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

Positive BV/share change while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

R&D dropping or stable vs. VUZI's 32.53%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.

We cut SG&A while VUZI invests at 28.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.