Apple Inc. (AAPL)

Positive gross profit growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction while VUZI is at 38.66%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while VUZI is at 60.15%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Dividend growth of 0.08% while VUZI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Positive OCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.

Positive FCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Positive OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.

3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 46.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.

Positive 10Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

Positive growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.

Inventory shrinking or stable vs. VUZI's 79.19%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.

Positive asset growth while VUZI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

We have some new debt while VUZI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.

Our R&D shrinks while VUZI invests at 15.32%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.

SG&A declining or stable vs. VUZI's 15.12%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.