229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-20.75%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-17.85%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-22.16%
Negative EBIT growth while VUZI is at 6.83%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-22.16%
Negative operating income growth while VUZI is at 6.83%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-21.79%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-19.23%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-19.23%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-2.38%
Share reduction while VUZI is at 3.14%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.43%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-1.56%
Dividend reduction while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-40.28%
Negative OCF growth while VUZI is at 15.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-41.57%
Negative FCF growth while VUZI is at 17.99%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
1897.31%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
469.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
95.30%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
18438.42%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
1539.97%
Positive OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
129.74%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
18463.88%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 106.57% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
764.31%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 106.57%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
80.21%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of VUZI's 108.81%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
2135.79%
Equity/share CAGR of 2135.79% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
403.62%
Equity/share CAGR of 403.62% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
106.31%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 37.34%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.69%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-13.81%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-8.52%
Negative asset growth while VUZI invests at 61.79%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-5.07%
We have a declining book value while VUZI shows 8.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
0.01%
Debt shrinking faster vs. VUZI's 180.18%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
6.92%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
-3.96%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.
