Apple Inc. (AAPL)

Positive gross profit growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

Positive EBIT growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.

Positive operating income growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.

Positive net income growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction while VUZI is at 28.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while VUZI is at 28.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

OCF growth above 1.5x VUZI's 8.21%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 77.15%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.

Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.

Positive 10Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.

Positive short-term CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.

Positive growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.

Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.

3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 45.10%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

AR growth is negative/stable vs. VUZI's 226.47%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.

We show growth while VUZI is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.

Positive asset growth while VUZI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.

R&D dropping or stable vs. VUZI's 18.69%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.

SG&A declining or stable vs. VUZI's 35.99%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.