229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.82%
Positive revenue growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
4.41%
Positive gross profit growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
3.83%
Positive EBIT growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
3.83%
Positive operating income growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
4.19%
Positive net income growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
4.26%
Positive EPS growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
6.52%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.45%
Share reduction while VUZI is at 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.57%
Reduced diluted shares while VUZI is at 1.05%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.49%
Dividend reduction while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-10.09%
Negative OCF growth while VUZI is at 22.08%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-23.89%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
1325.86%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
187.01%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
66.56%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1724.67%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
168.81%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 58.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
71.56%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
2534.31%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 5.79% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
192.74%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
57.35%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 45.26%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
1536.22%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 238.49%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
183.13%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of VUZI's 203.54%. Bill Ackman might push for an improved ROE or share repurchase strategy to keep up.
17.45%
Below 50% of VUZI's 157.25%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.48%
Our AR growth while VUZI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
15.03%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. VUZI's 90.08%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
6.29%
Positive asset growth while VUZI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-3.63%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
18.21%
Debt growth far above VUZI's 1.25%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
9.14%
R&D dropping or stable vs. VUZI's 48.64%. David Dodd sees near-term margin benefits if the product pipeline is already strong.
3.96%
SG&A growth well above VUZI's 4.80%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
