229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
67.92%
Positive revenue growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
70.15%
Gross profit growth under 50% of VUZI's 158.30%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
100.26%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VUZI's 8.14%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
100.26%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 8.14%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
87.28%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 8.74%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
88.46%
EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
86.54%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 9.09%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.71%
Share reduction while VUZI is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.50%
Reduced diluted shares while VUZI is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
2.84%
Dividend growth of 2.84% while VUZI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
80.72%
Positive OCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
118.63%
Positive FCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
1001.95%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
108.21%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
35.26%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
1117.33%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 5.78%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
55.25%
Positive OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-4.12%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
1421.86%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
97.22%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 22.92%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
27.22%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of VUZI's 45.65%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
900.46%
Equity/share CAGR of 900.46% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
41.52%
Below 50% of VUZI's 184.94%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
29.92%
Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.17%
Dividend/share CAGR of 72.17% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
36.23%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 36.23% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
42.68%
Our AR growth while VUZI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-8.94%
Inventory is declining while VUZI stands at 11.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
8.39%
Asset growth well under 50% of VUZI's 78.01%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
5.34%
Under 50% of VUZI's 108.54%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
5.81%
Debt growth of 5.81% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
13.68%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
10.93%
SG&A growth well above VUZI's 9.37%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
