229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
34.04%
Positive revenue growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
33.00%
Positive gross profit growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
44.84%
Positive EBIT growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
44.84%
Positive operating income growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
41.35%
Positive net income growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
41.89%
Positive EPS growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
43.84%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-1.37%
Share reduction while VUZI is at 9.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.53%
Reduced diluted shares while VUZI is at 9.12%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
2.48%
Dividend growth of 2.48% while VUZI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
36.71%
Positive OCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
41.58%
Positive FCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
989.83%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
93.89%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
30.43%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VUZI's 120.26%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
790.73%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 18.49%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
55.93%
Positive OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
14.08%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
1534.81%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
102.29%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
27.63%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 1.72%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
576.32%
Equity/share CAGR of 576.32% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
20.40%
Below 50% of VUZI's 198.82%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
7.89%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of VUZI's 13.94%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
70.67%
Dividend/share CAGR of 70.67% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
41.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 41.06% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-24.52%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
26.09%
Inventory growth well above VUZI's 11.38%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.19%
Positive asset growth while VUZI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
11.56%
Positive BV/share change while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.22%
Debt growth of 0.22% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
4.05%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
13.45%
SG&A declining or stable vs. VUZI's 57.95%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
