229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
43.38%
Positive revenue growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
44.85%
Gross profit growth under 50% of VUZI's 101.84%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
63.64%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 44.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
63.64%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 44.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
62.47%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 44.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic cost cutting or product mix explains this difference.
65.79%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 48.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
64.47%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 48.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
-1.69%
Share reduction while VUZI is at 7.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.45%
Reduced diluted shares while VUZI is at 7.16%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
3.47%
Dividend growth of 3.47% while VUZI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
53.27%
OCF growth above 1.5x VUZI's 2.43%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
65.81%
FCF growth above 1.5x VUZI's 6.71%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
738.72%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
62.89%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
40.64%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
656.20%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 69.24%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
19.76%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of VUZI's 37.45%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing revenue effectively.
34.48%
3Y OCF/share CAGR similar to VUZI's 34.82%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from a rising tide or parallel expansions.
842.99%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 62.28% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
63.27%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 56.89%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
49.16%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 23.70%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
258.58%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 213.77%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
-3.92%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-18.84%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.21%
Dividend/share CAGR of 67.21% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
35.70%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.70% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
-12.79%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-0.22%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
0.62%
Positive asset growth while VUZI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.64%
Positive BV/share change while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
0.23%
We have some new debt while VUZI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
8.30%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
13.52%
SG&A growth well above VUZI's 5.51%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.
