229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
48.69%
Positive revenue growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
54.21%
Gross profit growth under 50% of VUZI's 207.38%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
74.42%
EBIT growth above 1.5x VUZI's 38.15%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
74.42%
Operating income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 38.15%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
68.51%
Net income growth above 1.5x VUZI's 37.69%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
68.80%
EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 37.04%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
69.35%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x VUZI's 37.04%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-0.58%
Share reduction while VUZI is at 1.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.70%
Reduced diluted shares while VUZI is at 1.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
3.12%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while VUZI cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
132.50%
OCF growth above 1.5x VUZI's 20.27%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
160.13%
FCF growth above 1.5x VUZI's 22.49%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
325.44%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
104.54%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
69.89%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
325.51%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
122.98%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 48.04%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
103.36%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 52.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
321.58%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 30.30% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
150.28%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 21.54%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
100.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 27.79%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
27.03%
Below 50% of VUZI's 199.91%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-29.75%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VUZI is at 183.59%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-29.49%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VUZI is at 142.08%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.17%
Dividend/share CAGR of 54.17% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
20.88%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 20.88% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
26.69%
Our AR growth while VUZI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-10.70%
Inventory is declining while VUZI stands at 3.35%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
8.60%
Positive asset growth while VUZI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
14.68%
Positive BV/share change while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.54%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
9.25%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
14.83%
We expand SG&A while VUZI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
