229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.41%
Positive revenue growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
11.02%
Positive gross profit growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
17.27%
Positive EBIT growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
17.27%
Positive operating income growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
15.47%
Positive net income growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
15.75%
Positive EPS growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
15.87%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.63%
Share reduction while VUZI is at 2.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.65%
Reduced diluted shares while VUZI is at 2.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-1.75%
Dividend reduction while VUZI stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-18.13%
Negative OCF growth while VUZI is at 23.66%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-19.98%
Negative FCF growth while VUZI is at 14.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
287.62%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
75.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
51.26%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
253.77%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 57.68%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
36.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR at 75-90% of VUZI's 47.90%. Bill Ackman would push for operational improvements to match competitor’s mid-term gains.
14.78%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
395.95%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 46.23% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
100.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
98.07%
Positive short-term CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-18.37%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VUZI stands at 195.47%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-28.59%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VUZI is at 3.65%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
4.00%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VUZI's 3.11%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
120.26%
Dividend/share CAGR of 120.26% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
31.07%
Dividend/share CAGR of 31.07% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
17.04%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 17.04% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
55.63%
Our AR growth while VUZI is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-13.88%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
5.24%
Positive asset growth while VUZI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
3.75%
Positive BV/share change while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
13.41%
We have some new debt while VUZI reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-1.81%
Our R&D shrinks while VUZI invests at 20.88%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
2.98%
SG&A declining or stable vs. VUZI's 31.03%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.
