229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
33.61%
Revenue growth under 50% of VUZI's 87.82%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
35.69%
Gross profit growth under 50% of VUZI's 75.89%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
49.70%
EBIT growth similar to VUZI's 50.62%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
49.70%
Operating income growth similar to VUZI's 50.62%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
47.74%
Net income growth comparable to VUZI's 49.46%. Walter Schloss might see both following similar market or cost trajectories.
48.98%
EPS growth similar to VUZI's 48.39%. Walter Schloss would assume both have parallel share structures and profit trends.
49.32%
Similar diluted EPS growth to VUZI's 48.39%. Walter Schloss might see standard sector or cyclical influences on both firms.
-0.57%
Share reduction while VUZI is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.61%
Reduced diluted shares while VUZI is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
2.37%
Dividend growth of 2.37% while VUZI is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
84.72%
Positive OCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
92.97%
Positive FCF growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
235.86%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
73.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
17.16%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
184.68%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
82.57%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 36.09%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
12.38%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
319.72%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
107.48%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VUZI's 32.64%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
28.79%
Positive short-term CAGR while VUZI is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-7.57%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VUZI stands at 225.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-23.23%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VUZI is at 27.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
22.18%
Positive short-term equity growth while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
123.46%
Dividend/share CAGR of 123.46% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a slight advantage in stepping up payouts steadily.
30.94%
Dividend/share CAGR of 30.94% while VUZI is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
15.60%
Our short-term dividend growth is positive while VUZI cut theirs. John Neff views it as a comparative advantage in shareholder returns.
-17.85%
Firm’s AR is declining while VUZI shows 15.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
2.84%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. VUZI's 12.74%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
0.26%
Positive asset growth while VUZI is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
19.92%
Positive BV/share change while VUZI is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-12.82%
We’re deleveraging while VUZI stands at 190.47%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
5.32%
We increase R&D while VUZI cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
10.32%
We expand SG&A while VUZI cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
