229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
15.83%
Positive revenue growth while WLDS is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
16.68%
Positive gross profit growth while WLDS is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
19.11%
EBIT growth 1.25-1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic initiatives are driving this edge.
19.11%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x WLDS's 14.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.
22.06%
Net income growth above 1.5x WLDS's 12.85%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
21.74%
Positive EPS growth while WLDS is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
21.74%
Positive diluted EPS growth while WLDS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.32%
Slight or no buybacks while WLDS is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.20%
Slight or no buyback while WLDS is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
78.61%
OCF growth above 1.5x WLDS's 2.82%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
82.38%
FCF growth above 1.5x WLDS's 3.54%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
1358.93%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x WLDS's 338.04%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
501.04%
5Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x WLDS's 338.04%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if cost efficiency or pricing power supports this advantage.
265.27%
3Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x WLDS's 187.85%. Bruce Berkowitz might see better product or regional expansions than the competitor.
25452.64%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while WLDS is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
914.06%
Positive OCF/share growth while WLDS is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
702.41%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while WLDS is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
8923.39%
Positive 10Y CAGR while WLDS is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1323.36%
Positive 5Y CAGR while WLDS is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
550.53%
Positive short-term CAGR while WLDS is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
1253.76%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WLDS's 205.64%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
583.25%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x WLDS's 205.64%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
237.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of WLDS's 276.48%. Bill Ackman pushes for margin or operational changes to match the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.39%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. WLDS's 621.28%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-4.41%
Inventory is declining while WLDS stands at 0.66%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
12.49%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x WLDS's 11.24%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
12.44%
Under 50% of WLDS's 160.75%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.09%
We increase R&D while WLDS cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
8.62%
We expand SG&A while WLDS cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.
