229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.39%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Electronics median is -1.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-2.56%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Electronics median is 6.31%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-4.69%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Electronics median is 19.82%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-4.69%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Electronics median is 5.71%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-5.43%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Electronics median is -2.73%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-4.85%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is -2.28%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-4.85%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is -2.51%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.61%
Share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.02%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.72%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is -0.22%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
5.62%
Dividend growth of 5.62% while Consumer Electronics median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
16.35%
OCF growth below 50% of Consumer Electronics median of 61.11%. Jim Chanos would question if the firm is generating genuine operational cash.
16.88%
FCF growth below 50% of Consumer Electronics median of 73.00%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about fundamental cash generation problems.
191.54%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch would note a clear advantage in stable or growing demand.
82.37%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 47.49%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
22.94%
3Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Consumer Electronics median of 31.79%. Guy Spier might worry about a waning short-term advantage.
185.94%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 52.77% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
98.24%
5Y OCF/share growth near Consumer Electronics median. Charlie Munger might attribute it to standard sector conditions for mid-term OCF expansions.
32.03%
Below 50% of Consumer Electronics median. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental problems or inadequate monetization of sales in the near term.
237.55%
Positive 10Y net income/share CAGR while Consumer Electronics is negative. Peter Lynch sees a resilient enterprise vs. struggling peers.
141.05%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 37.68%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
30.72%
3Y net income/share CAGR near Consumer Electronics median. Charlie Munger sees standard sector-level performance in the last few years.
-19.44%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is 113.13%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
5.42%
Below 50% of Consumer Electronics median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
22.87%
3Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Consumer Electronics median. John Neff calls for overhead or margin tweaks to keep pace with peers.
98.73%
Dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Consumer Electronics median. Mohnish Pabrai might credit prudent capital returns, so long as coverage ratios remain strong.
24.90%
5Y dividend/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Consumer Electronics median. Mohnish Pabrai might confirm stable coverage ratios for these dividend increases.
12.27%
3Y dividend/share growth 50-75% of Consumer Electronics median. Guy Spier suspects the firm lags in near-term shareholder returns vs. peers.
-5.95%
AR shrinking while Consumer Electronics median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-5.49%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Electronics is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.08%
Below 50% of Consumer Electronics median. Jim Chanos suspects stagnation or limited capital availability for expansions.
-0.84%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Electronics median is 6.09%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
3.58%
Debt growth far outpacing Consumer Electronics median. Jim Chanos suspects over-leveraging or deteriorating financial discipline.
3.70%
R&D growth of 3.70% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-1.16%
SG&A decline while Consumer Electronics grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
