229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.62%
Positive revenue growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
-14.70%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Electronics median is -14.70%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-50.00%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Electronics median is -46.43%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-50.00%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Electronics median is -50.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-41.75%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Electronics median is -41.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-42.67%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is -42.67%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-42.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is -42.67%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1.25%
Share change of 1.25% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.25%
Diluted share change of 1.25% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
5.82%
Dividend growth of 5.82% while Consumer Electronics median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-2488.46%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-759.52%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
626.85%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 216.90%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
115.21%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 39.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
64.92%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 41.77%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-768.47%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-3196.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-40.89%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-40.32%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is -38.52%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
422.57%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 175.19% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
94.58%
5Y equity/share CAGR near Consumer Electronics median. Charlie Munger finds it normal mid-term expansion for the industry.
28.75%
3Y equity/share CAGR near Consumer Electronics median. Charlie Munger notes it as typical short-term equity expansion in the sector.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.84%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 12.84% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
2.55%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 2.55% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
24.34%
AR growth of 24.34% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
29.85%
Inventory growth of 29.85% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.95%
Asset growth of 1.95% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
1.32%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
7.76%
Debt growth of 7.76% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
1.79%
R&D growth of 1.79% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-6.44%
SG&A decline while Consumer Electronics grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
