229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-46.15%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Electronics median is -3.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-104.50%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Electronics median is -9.30%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-391.67%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Electronics median is -0.77%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-391.67%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Electronics median is -0.77%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-221.76%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Electronics median is -9.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-218.28%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is -5.88%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-230.95%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is -11.76%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
3.12%
Share growth above Consumer Electronics median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
-6.73%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.16%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-108.23%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-127.56%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-58.08%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is 48.02%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-76.66%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is 38.73%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-51.55%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-104.00%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-105.07%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-107.48%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-195.93%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Electronics median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-118.87%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-434.37%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is -64.34%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
67.56%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 17.32% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
-3.07%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
126.54%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 36.88%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-53.73%
AR shrinking while Consumer Electronics median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-36.36%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Electronics is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-12.01%
Assets shrink while Consumer Electronics median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-12.35%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Electronics median is -9.07%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
3.67%
Debt growth of 3.67% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
0.99%
R&D growth of 0.99% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
5.32%
SG&A growth far above Consumer Electronics median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.
