229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.76%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-30.93%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Electronics median is 1.09%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-39.51%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-39.51%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Electronics median is 3.63%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-31.11%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-29.59%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-29.90%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.72%
Share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.73%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-2.79%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-46.52%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-57.09%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
897.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 3.43%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
83.53%
5Y CAGR of 83.53% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight improvement that could compound if momentum builds.
21.52%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 4.27%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
1453.92%
OCF/share CAGR of 1453.92% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
58.39%
OCF/share CAGR of 58.39% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-8.57%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
1520.64%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 5.87% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
89.51%
Net income/share CAGR of 89.51% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
17.45%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 2.94%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
761.13%
Equity/share CAGR of 761.13% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
22.58%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 22.58% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
13.40%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 13.40% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.63%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 67.63% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
34.09%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 34.09% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-55.98%
AR shrinking while Consumer Electronics median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
73.31%
Inventory growth far above Consumer Electronics median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-9.66%
Assets shrink while Consumer Electronics median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-7.92%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.46%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Electronics median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-0.85%
R&D dropping while Consumer Electronics median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-1.91%
SG&A decline while Consumer Electronics grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
