229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.09%
Revenue growth of 18.09% vs. zero growth in Consumer Electronics. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
17.94%
Gross profit growth of 17.94% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
27.80%
Positive EBIT growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
27.80%
Positive operating income growth while Consumer Electronics is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
22.62%
Positive net income growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
25.42%
EPS growth of 25.42% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
25.86%
Diluted EPS growth of 25.86% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-1.65%
Share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.60%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is -0.01%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.75%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
34.75%
OCF growth of 34.75% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
46.89%
FCF growth of 46.89% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
930.36%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 12.98%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
121.26%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 3.64%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
43.64%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 2.01%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
487.86%
OCF/share CAGR of 487.86% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
159.73%
OCF/share CAGR of 159.73% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
70.39%
3Y OCF/share growth of 70.39% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
1508.05%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 89.25% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
147.85%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 19.53%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
49.33%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 13.47%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
521.47%
Equity/share CAGR of 521.47% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
14.31%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Consumer Electronics median. Mohnish Pabrai might see disciplined retention of earnings behind outperformance.
5.58%
3Y equity/share CAGR near Consumer Electronics median. Charlie Munger notes it as typical short-term equity expansion in the sector.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
68.04%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 68.04% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
40.06%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 40.06% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
85.82%
AR growth of 85.82% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-33.36%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Electronics is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
4.73%
Asset growth of 4.73% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-5.22%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.10%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Electronics median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
1.32%
R&D growth of 1.32% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
2.63%
SG&A growth far above Consumer Electronics median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.
