229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.25%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Electronics median is 3.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-7.30%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Electronics median is 3.15%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-11.53%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Electronics median is 11.31%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-11.53%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Electronics median is 11.31%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-13.12%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Electronics median is 15.86%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-11.29%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is 8.27%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-9.84%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is 8.27%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-2.21%
Share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.03%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-2.11%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.03%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
7.79%
Dividend growth of 7.79% while Consumer Electronics median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
4.31%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 2.98%. Mohnish Pabrai would verify if these gains stem from sustainable core operations.
9.60%
FCF growth near Consumer Electronics median of 9.60%. Charlie Munger could consider this standard for the industry’s capex cycle.
783.41%
10Y CAGR of 783.41% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
89.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might identify a real advantage vs. struggling peers.
51.28%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 1.48%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
601.61%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 46.73% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
49.26%
5Y OCF/share growth 1.25-1.5x Consumer Electronics median. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent operational improvements enable better cash yields.
30.31%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 0.01%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
1018.60%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 43.03% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
70.53%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 16.29%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
53.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 22.35%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
409.98%
Equity/share CAGR of 409.98% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
4.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 4.92% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-9.23%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
66.51%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 66.51% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
35.60%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.60% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
0.75%
Receivables growth far exceeding Consumer Electronics median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
-31.31%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Electronics is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-5.78%
Assets shrink while Consumer Electronics median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-6.82%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Electronics median is 0.24%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-3.74%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Electronics median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
7.83%
R&D growth of 7.83% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-0.72%
SG&A decline while Consumer Electronics grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
