229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
43.38%
Positive revenue growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
44.85%
Positive gross profit growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
63.64%
Positive EBIT growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
63.64%
Positive operating income growth while Consumer Electronics is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
62.47%
Positive net income growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
65.79%
Positive EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
64.47%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
-1.69%
Share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.45%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
3.47%
Dividend growth of 3.47% while Consumer Electronics median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
53.27%
Positive OCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
65.81%
Positive FCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
738.72%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch would note a clear advantage in stable or growing demand.
62.89%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might identify a real advantage vs. struggling peers.
40.64%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a short-term advantage or a successful new product line.
656.20%
OCF/share CAGR of 656.20% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
19.76%
OCF/share CAGR of 19.76% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
34.48%
3Y OCF/share growth of 34.48% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
842.99%
Net income/share CAGR of 842.99% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
63.27%
Net income/share CAGR of 63.27% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
49.16%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 5.79%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
258.58%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 20.22% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
-3.92%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-18.84%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.21%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 67.21% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
35.70%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 35.70% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-12.79%
AR shrinking while Consumer Electronics median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-0.22%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Electronics is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.62%
We expand assets while Consumer Electronics is negative. Peter Lynch sees a possible advantage if expansions align with profitable markets or a recovering cycle.
0.64%
Positive BV/share change while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
0.23%
Debt growth far outpacing Consumer Electronics median. Jim Chanos suspects over-leveraging or deteriorating financial discipline.
8.30%
We slightly increase R&D while Consumer Electronics is cutting. Peter Lynch sees a chance to grab market share with new offerings if ROI is managed well.
13.52%
Our SG&A slightly up while Consumer Electronics is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.
