229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-36.49%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Electronics median is 3.35%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-36.48%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Electronics median is 1.56%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-49.73%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Electronics median is 8.11%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-49.73%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Electronics median is 10.38%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-49.41%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Electronics median is 16.01%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-49.21%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is 12.52%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-48.80%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is 12.22%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.24%
Share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.12%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-3.43%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-56.38%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-59.67%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
529.41%
10Y CAGR of 529.41% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
33.58%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might identify a real advantage vs. struggling peers.
32.13%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a short-term advantage or a successful new product line.
732.39%
OCF/share CAGR of 732.39% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-7.30%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
26.92%
3Y OCF/share growth near Consumer Electronics median. Charlie Munger would find it typical for industry-level short-term expansions.
433.19%
Net income/share CAGR of 433.19% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
10.16%
Net income/share CAGR of 10.16% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
22.25%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 22.25% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
190.40%
Equity/share CAGR of 190.40% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
-19.22%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-29.90%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
63.50%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 63.50% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
34.66%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 34.66% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-23.20%
AR shrinking while Consumer Electronics median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-18.62%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Electronics is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-5.94%
Assets shrink while Consumer Electronics median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-11.30%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
1.12%
Debt growth far outpacing Consumer Electronics median. Jim Chanos suspects over-leveraging or deteriorating financial discipline.
2.56%
R&D growth of 2.56% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-4.71%
SG&A decline while Consumer Electronics grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
