229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
72.24%
Positive revenue growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
79.55%
Positive gross profit growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
126.96%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 3.75%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
126.96%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 1.28%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
126.90%
Net income growth of 126.90% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
129.73%
Positive EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
130.14%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
-0.72%
Share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.83%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
3.65%
Dividend growth of 3.65% while Consumer Electronics median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
88.39%
Positive OCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
87.65%
Positive FCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
533.41%
10Y CAGR of 533.41% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
92.85%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 4.17%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
52.42%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a short-term advantage or a successful new product line.
502.86%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 69.34% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
85.32%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 48.17%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
65.45%
3Y OCF/share growth 1.25-1.5x Consumer Electronics median. Mohnish Pabrai would confirm if cost advantage or brand strength explains near-term outperformance.
627.94%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 101.29% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
105.63%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Consumer Electronics median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
73.07%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 42.64%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
84.13%
Equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Consumer Electronics median. Mohnish Pabrai might credit disciplined reinvestment or conservative payout ratios for outperformance.
-32.21%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is 16.53%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-42.96%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is 4.66%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
59.78%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 59.78% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
30.67%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 30.67% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
56.55%
AR growth of 56.55% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
22.46%
Inventory growth far above Consumer Electronics median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
9.31%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 1.18%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
2.09%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-0.35%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Electronics median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
3.72%
R&D growth of 3.72% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
14.08%
Our SG&A slightly up while Consumer Electronics is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.
