229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-13.75%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Electronics median is 1.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-13.25%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Electronics median is 6.09%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-18.79%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Electronics median is 14.73%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-18.79%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Electronics median is 8.25%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-17.71%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Electronics median is 22.45%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-16.99%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is 24.48%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-17.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is 24.66%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.57%
Share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.45%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
6.05%
Dividend growth of 6.05% while Consumer Electronics median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-7.63%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.04%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-5.29%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is 2.29%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
279.44%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 1.68%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
91.04%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might identify a real advantage vs. struggling peers.
50.60%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 0.85%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
452.18%
OCF/share CAGR of 452.18% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
126.52%
OCF/share CAGR of 126.52% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
78.17%
3Y OCF/share growth of 78.17% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
372.12%
Net income/share CAGR of 372.12% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
114.72%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 5.88%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
94.15%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
-19.94%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-34.77%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is 17.93%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-8.36%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is 10.34%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
124.36%
Dividend/share CAGR of 124.36% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
31.08%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 31.08% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
15.69%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 15.69% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
9.16%
AR growth of 9.16% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-1.75%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Electronics is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.87%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x Consumer Electronics median. Mohnish Pabrai sees if expansions are strategic and well-supported by end demand.
-2.48%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Electronics median is -1.05%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.31%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Electronics median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-0.20%
R&D dropping while Consumer Electronics median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-3.68%
SG&A decline while Consumer Electronics grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
