229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.41%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
11.02%
Gross profit growth of 11.02% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
17.27%
Positive EBIT growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
17.27%
Positive operating income growth while Consumer Electronics is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
15.47%
Positive net income growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
15.75%
Positive EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
15.87%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
-0.63%
Share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.65%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.75%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-18.13%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-19.98%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
287.62%
10Y CAGR of 287.62% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound over very long horizons.
75.19%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might identify a real advantage vs. struggling peers.
51.26%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a short-term advantage or a successful new product line.
253.77%
OCF/share CAGR of 253.77% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
36.21%
OCF/share CAGR of 36.21% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
14.78%
3Y OCF/share growth of 14.78% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
395.95%
Net income/share CAGR of 395.95% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
100.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a notable advantage vs. peers struggling to grow net income/share.
98.07%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
-18.37%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is 14.37%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-28.59%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is 6.84%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
4.00%
3Y equity/share CAGR near Consumer Electronics median. Charlie Munger notes it as typical short-term equity expansion in the sector.
120.26%
Dividend/share CAGR of 120.26% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
31.07%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 31.07% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
17.04%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 17.04% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
55.63%
AR growth of 55.63% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-13.88%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Electronics is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
5.24%
Asset growth of 5.24% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
3.75%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
13.41%
Debt growth of 13.41% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-1.81%
R&D dropping while Consumer Electronics median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
2.98%
SG&A growth far above Consumer Electronics median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.
