229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-23.28%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Electronics median is -1.88%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-23.01%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Electronics median is 2.81%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-30.92%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-30.92%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-31.79%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Electronics median is 8.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-31.54%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is 8.32%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-31.25%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Electronics median is 8.32%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.58%
Share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is -0.58%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.63%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Electronics median is -0.63%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.97%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-19.99%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is -19.99%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-22.65%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Electronics median is -22.65%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
154.08%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 12.76%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
90.21%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 39.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
6.43%
3Y revenue/share growth near Consumer Electronics median of 6.43%. Charlie Munger would note typical industry expansions over the short term.
94.02%
OCF/share CAGR near Consumer Electronics median of 94.02%. Charlie Munger might attribute it to typical industry growth patterns.
109.30%
5Y OCF/share growth 1.25-1.5x Consumer Electronics median. Mohnish Pabrai would see if consistent operational improvements enable better cash yields.
-7.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Electronics median is 28.32%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
182.26%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 100.00% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
156.23%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Electronics median of 83.48%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
7.57%
3Y net income/share CAGR near Consumer Electronics median. Charlie Munger sees standard sector-level performance in the last few years.
-19.97%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-0.93%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Electronics median is -0.93%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
7.60%
Positive short-term equity/share CAGR while Consumer Electronics is negative. Peter Lynch finds a relative advantage vs. sector-level slowdown.
111.76%
Dividend/share CAGR of 111.76% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
29.51%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.51% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
13.49%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 13.49% while Consumer Electronics is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-16.03%
AR shrinking while Consumer Electronics median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-9.29%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Electronics is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-3.74%
Assets shrink while Consumer Electronics median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.64%
Positive BV/share change while Consumer Electronics median is negative. Peter Lynch finds a strong advantage vs. peers failing to expand equity.
1.43%
Debt growth of 1.43% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
3.41%
R&D growth of 3.41% while Consumer Electronics median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-6.23%
SG&A decline while Consumer Electronics grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
