229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.78%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-3.03%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 2.60%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-22.87%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is -9.17%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-22.87%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is -9.17%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-17.78%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-15.12%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-15.12%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-3.00%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-3.00%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.76%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-67.63%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-88.09%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
237.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 60.86%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
237.74%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 60.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
79.33%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 30.45%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
168.56%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 30.00% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
168.56%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 30.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
80.15%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 22.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.99%
AR growth of 7.99% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
21.79%
Inventory growth of 21.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
2.98%
Asset growth of 2.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-1.02%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
392.37%
Debt growth of 392.37% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.26%
SG&A growth of 1.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
