229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.58%
Revenue growth below 50% of Technology median of 4.34%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
-1.63%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 3.43%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-34.56%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-34.56%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-25.89%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-25.00%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-25.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.70%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.38%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-0.00%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-91.04%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-112.79%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
340.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 86.66%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
134.02%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 53.93%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
33.21%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 20.35%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
305.89%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 30.66% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
172.27%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 25.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
53.52%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 15.19%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.65%
AR growth of 13.65% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
8.27%
Inventory growth of 8.27% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
2.49%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
3.83%
BV/share growth of 3.83% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
2.39%
Debt growth of 2.39% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.31%
SG&A growth of 9.31% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.