229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.32%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 6.59%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-5.69%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 6.36%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-29.78%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 9.01%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-29.78%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 10.77%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-31.26%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 9.80%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-31.09%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 2.22%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-31.09%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 2.22%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.51%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.51%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-5.08%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-167.01%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-393.58%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
401.78%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 79.01%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
135.13%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 43.24%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
54.15%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 25.13%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-118.30%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.54%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.98%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 54.98% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.77%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 4.77% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
7.26%
AR growth of 7.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
46.97%
Inventory growth of 46.97% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-0.55%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.66%
BV/share growth of 0.66% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-68.57%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
3.79%
SG&A growth of 3.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
