229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.67%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 2.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-19.27%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 2.38%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-281.37%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 3.68%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-281.37%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 4.12%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-269.79%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 2.97%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-276.83%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-270.73%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-4.04%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.08%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.08%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.08%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
8.10%
Dividend growth of 8.10% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-425.95%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-245.82%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
357.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 80.02%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
111.63%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 33.25%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
47.19%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 23.67%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-199.29%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-269.58%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.67%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 44.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.36%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 12.36% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-1.58%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
41.28%
Inventory growth of 41.28% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
6.66%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.49%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-7.90%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
414.52%
Debt growth of 414.52% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.25%
SG&A growth of 54.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
