229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
14.97%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 5.12%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-8.42%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 3.57%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
103.26%
EBIT growth of 103.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
103.26%
Operating income growth of 103.26% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
101.43%
Net income growth of 101.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
101.38%
EPS growth of 101.38% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
101.43%
Diluted EPS growth of 101.43% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.80%
Share change of 0.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
-1.94%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.19%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-43.95%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-27.73%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
454.38%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 78.91%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
92.88%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 32.19%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
64.15%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 24.98%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-524.87%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.15%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
290.54%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 10.72% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
112.65%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 12.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
45.42%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 1.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.87%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 11.87% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
9.21%
AR growth of 9.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
21.63%
Inventory growth of 21.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
8.46%
Asset growth of 8.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
-0.50%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
169.40%
Debt growth of 169.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-40.47%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
