229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-15.87%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 7.17%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-15.71%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 6.87%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-45.91%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 9.26%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-45.91%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 9.26%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-57.50%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 8.19%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-58.06%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 6.19%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-58.06%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 6.19%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
1.70%
Share change of 1.70% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.64%
Diluted share change of 1.64% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-1.67%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-104.59%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-126.68%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
435.09%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 84.15%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
78.90%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 37.76%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
32.67%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 26.56%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.15%
3Y OCF/share growth of 4.15% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-86.77%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.63%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 18.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.33%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 1.33% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
7.63%
AR growth of 7.63% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-3.89%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
4.83%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.37%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
1.00%
BV/share growth of 1.00% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
5.76%
Debt growth of 5.76% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-12.20%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-11.93%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
