229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
3.51%
Revenue growth near Technology median of 3.36%. Charlie Munger might attribute this to overall industry trends.
15.00%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.96%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-160.83%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.45%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-160.83%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.45%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
711.76%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.33%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
700.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.78%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
700.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.78%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-0.07%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.07%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
0.07%
Dividend growth of 0.07% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
935.29%
OCF growth of 935.29% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
227.25%
FCF growth of 227.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
413.71%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 95.80%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
79.71%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 48.09%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
42.80%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 34.71%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
206.40%
3Y OCF/share growth of 206.40% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
363.87%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 66.19%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.80%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 36.80% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.29%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-4.92%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-6.96%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-3.07%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
6.52%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
3.12%
Debt growth of 3.12% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
1.07%
R&D growth of 1.07% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
0.87%
SG&A growth of 0.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
