229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.36%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 8.81%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-14.62%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 8.29%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-41.55%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 8.49%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-41.55%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 8.96%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-61.17%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 8.55%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-61.59%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 6.36%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-61.59%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 6.10%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.86%
Share growth above Technology median by more than 2x. Jim Chanos would suspect over-dilution or repeated equity raises.
0.86%
Diluted share growth above 2x Technology median. Jim Chanos would suspect undue issuance or heavy employee stock compensation.
6.23%
Dividend growth of 6.23% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-98.68%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-105.57%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
562.61%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 102.41%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
103.56%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 44.79%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
54.76%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 40.68%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.96%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-98.13%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-42.77%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 14.02%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-45.89%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 76.85%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.83%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 80.83% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
30.23%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 30.23% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.81%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 14.81% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
3.60%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 3.60% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
2.13%
Receivables growth far exceeding Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
-9.23%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
9.34%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 1.27%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
5.03%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
81.48%
Debt growth of 81.48% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
8.33%
R&D growth of 8.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-6.99%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
