229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.90%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 4.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
4.75%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 3.86%. Mohnish Pabrai would see if economies of scale justify the premium growth.
-2.41%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-2.41%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
41.10%
Net income growth of 41.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
41.51%
EPS growth of 41.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
41.51%
Diluted EPS growth of 41.51% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.46%
Share change of 0.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.46%
Diluted share change of 0.46% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-7.09%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-533.33%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-250.00%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
493.60%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 123.63%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
91.11%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 52.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
46.46%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 38.21%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-108.73%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-110.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.91%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 16.17%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-22.59%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 65.48%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
90.10%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 90.10% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
31.95%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 31.95% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.82%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 5.82% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
-3.10%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-4.90%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
38.92%
Inventory growth of 38.92% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
1.02%
Asset growth 50-75% of Technology median. Guy Spier sees potential underinvestment or overcaution vs. peers.
3.73%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-23.85%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
17.48%
R&D growth of 17.48% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
4.66%
SG&A growth of 4.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
