229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.83%
Revenue growth of 4.83% vs. zero growth in Technology. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-23.51%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-246.91%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 2.07%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-246.91%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 2.07%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-215.00%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-216.28%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-216.28%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-1.40%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-1.40%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
1.42%
Dividend growth of 1.42% while Technology median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
127.79%
OCF growth of 127.79% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
121.61%
FCF growth of 121.61% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
492.30%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 95.05%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
79.61%
5Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 55.62%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the outperformance to scale or brand strength.
55.02%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 45.10%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.21%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
133.74%
3Y OCF/share growth of 133.74% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-143.83%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 50.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-142.13%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 64.28%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.87%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 72.87% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
20.56%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 20.56% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.16%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 3.16% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
3.72%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 3.72% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
0.67%
AR growth of 0.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
9.69%
Inventory growth of 9.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
5.17%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.58%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-2.32%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-34.82%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-10.53%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
16.67%
SG&A growth of 16.67% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.
