229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-30.59%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-188.63%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 3.15%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-893.28%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 0.84%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-893.28%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 1.13%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-972.46%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 1.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-968.00%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 0.85%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-968.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 0.85%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.54%
Share change of 0.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.54%
Diluted share change of 0.54% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-93.37%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-293.58%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-337.82%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
441.45%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 82.38%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
34.25%
5Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 44.09%. John Neff would expect a plan to align with peers or surpass them.
7.91%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 31.33%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1863.28%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-568.24%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-654.09%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 45.91%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-750.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Technology median is 50.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 11.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-12.33%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-93.04%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-92.75%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-29.73%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-24.70%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-20.13%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-26.81%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.13%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
31.53%
Debt growth of 31.53% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-1.96%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-8.39%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
