229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.27%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
195.72%
Gross profit growth of 195.72% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
90.19%
EBIT growth of 90.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
90.19%
Operating income growth of 90.19% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
95.68%
Net income growth of 95.68% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
95.69%
EPS growth of 95.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
95.69%
Diluted EPS growth of 95.69% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.06%
Share change of 0.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.06%
Diluted share change of 0.06% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
179.28%
OCF growth of 179.28% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
173.32%
FCF growth of 173.32% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
400.15%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 82.02%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
39.03%
5Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Technology median of 45.73%. John Neff would expect a plan to align with peers or surpass them.
9.40%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 29.15%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
306.58%
OCF/share CAGR of 306.58% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
196.60%
3Y OCF/share growth of 196.60% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.22%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 23.81%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
84.11%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 38.68%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.24%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 18.24% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
-6.54%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
-5.42%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-27.63%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.12%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 0.83%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-1.81%
Negative BV/share change while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
73.44%
Debt growth of 73.44% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
3.33%
R&D growth of 3.33% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-9.90%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
