229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.52%
Revenue growth near Technology median of 6.87%. Charlie Munger might attribute this to overall industry trends.
26.80%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.06%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
61.21%
EBIT growth of 61.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
61.21%
Operating income growth of 61.21% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
178.13%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 4.92%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
178.26%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 8.33%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
178.26%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 11.67%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
0.66%
Share change of 0.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.66%
Diluted share change of 0.66% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.81%
OCF growth of 41.81% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
45.22%
FCF growth of 45.22% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
356.97%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 61.23%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
52.25%
5Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Technology median of 41.79%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the outperformance to scale or brand strength.
1.49%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 25.98%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
626.25%
OCF/share CAGR of 626.25% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
195.30%
3Y OCF/share growth of 195.30% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.56%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Technology median is 29.42%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
766.79%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 35.48%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
198.19%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 43.17% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
15.16%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects weak profitability or questionable capital allocation limiting equity growth.
-4.93%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 21.30%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-100.00%
Dividend reductions while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
15.79%
AR growth of 15.79% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-37.61%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.36%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos suspects stagnation or limited capital availability for expansions.
1.22%
BV/share growth of 1.22% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-0.09%
Debt is shrinking while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-5.81%
R&D dropping while Technology median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-1.37%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
